Cashback Offer (1st - 15th August, 2020). Get Flat 10% Cashback credited in your account on minimum transaction of $50. Post Your Question

Question DetailsNormal
$ 29.00

The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student's clinical reasonining, confidence, and..

Question posted by
request

                                           Topic   ACNE VULGARIS                                  Grand Rounds

Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion.

 

Description

In Weeks 2 and 6, you will create a Grand Rounds presentation on the topic assigned to you by the faculty member.

 

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

1.    Describe the most commonly prescribed drugs use in primary care for the chose condition.

2.    Utilize clinical guidelines, research articles or other materials to support your findings.

3.    Identify any practice barriers, issues, or problems (including cultural diversity and healthcare literacy).

4.    Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

 

Due Dates:                             Pediatric Grand Rounds due Week 2 (please see specific days/times below)

                                                Women’s Health Grand Rounds due Week 6 (please see specific days/times below)

Total Points Possible:          Week 2 - 150 points

                                                Week 6 – 150 points

Requirements:

Keep in mind the following guidelines and grading criteria while taking part in this assignment:

The Grand Rounds presentation will consist of a patient scenario that is assigned to you by your faculty in week oneThe presentation is a video recording in Kaltura.   Recording of the presentation should be interesting, professional, and focused to the topic. Wear your lab coat and name tag/badge during the recording.   

  • Record and upload presentation by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Begin facilitating discussion and continue to lead it throughout the week.
  • Participate in ongoing interactive dialogue by responding to a minimal of two (2) of your peer’s discussion questions by Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
  • Participate in all faculty directed questions to your presentation by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
  • Utilize a minimal of three peer reviewed scholarly articles from Chamberlain Online Library and a minimal of 2 current (within last 5 years) evidence based clinical guidelines to support your findings.
  • Discuss Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical physical assessment findings of the assigned topic.
  • List and discuss a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses. 
  • Discuss any diagnostic studies to confirm diagnosis of assigned topic
  • Discuss prevention (if not applicable, discuss why).
  • Discuss Treatment including nonpharmacologic management and pharmacologic management
  • Discuss patient and/or family education.
  • Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT - In addition to submitting your presentation, you will also need to lead a discussion on your topic in the discussion thread.  The initial post and Kaltura presentation are both due by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT.  NOTE: By Wednesday, you will also initiate a discussion to lead.

Discussion Lead Requirement: Develop three (3) questions on your topic you can ask to initiate the discussion and keep it going.

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, respond substantively to a minimal of two (2) peers’ presentation questions **If all students have a response, then choose the student with the least responses to their posting.

By Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, summarize your grand rounds presentation by posting a summary reply to your initial post in the discussion thread.  Summarize the discussion as well as conclusions from the collective group discussion.  Include evidence based references at the bottom of the summary AND respond to ALL faculty questions regarding your presentation.

Grand Rounds Presentation Criteria

Category

Points

Description

Introduction

20

Introduction of topic that include pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Clinical Assessment

5

Discussed typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic.

Differential Diagnoses

20

List AND discuss of a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10

Discuss prevention and treatment options for chosen topic.

Education

10

Discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10

Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

Lead Discussion

10

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) discussion question for peers.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, Interactive dialogue with at least two peer’s initial presentation by responding substantively to all questions posed and citing related research to support.

Summary Requirement

10

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, add summary post to own grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion.  Include conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

Evidence Based Research/Articles

10

Include minimal of three (3) evidence based research and/or Peer Reviewed articles from Chamberlain Online Library.

Evidence Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10

Include a minimal of two (2) current (within last 5 years) EBP clinical guidelines.

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10

Responds to ALL faculty directed questions on initial presentation. Includes scholarly support from EBP clinical guidelines and/or peer reviewed journal articles obtained from Chamberlain Online Library.

Presentation Development

5

Overall Presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura. Labcoat and name badge are present.

Total

 150

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

 

 

 

 

 

Grading Rubric PowerPoint Presentation- Week 6

Criterion

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

 

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

 

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

 

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

 

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points =  150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

20 Points

17 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

 

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic that include a detailed review of pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic, but omits one of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits two of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

 

OR

 

Provides vague description of 1-2 of the following criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

 

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits all three of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

 

 

OR

 

Provides vague description of all three (2) criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

 

Does not present an Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic.

Clinical Assessment

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

1 Points

0 Points

Discusses in detail typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic and etiology.

Describes in general the clinical assessment findings for chosen topic and etiology.

List of clinical assessment findings instead of a discussion with etiology for chosen topic and etiology.

Lists clinical assessment findings instead of a discussion with etiology for chosen topic without inclusion of etiology.

Does not describe clinical assessment findings.

 

Differential Diagnoses

20 Points

17 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

List AND discuss in detail a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

 

List AND discuss in detail two (2) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

 

List three differential diagnoses but does not include a discussion with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

 

List two or less differential diagnoses but does not include a discussion with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

 

Does not list and discuss differential diagnoses.

 

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis and rationale and scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with rationale, but omits scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with scholarly support but omits rationale.

Vague discussion of of diagnostic studies and labs used to confirm diagnosis, omits both the rationales AND scholarly support from clinical. guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Does not discuss diagnostic studies/labs.

 

Prevention and Treatment Options

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication and non-pharmacological options.

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication, does not include non-pharmacological option(s).

Discuss treatment options but does not include one of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Discuss treatment options but does not include two or more of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Does not prevention and treatment options.

Education

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

Discusses in detail patient AND family education for chosen grand rounds topic with rationales.

Provides a general discussion of patient and family education with rationales.

Lists patient and family education instead of a discussion with rationales.

Lists patient OR education instead of a discussion without inclusion of rationales.

 

OR

 

Information discussed is vague or unclear.

Does not discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care.

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication. Omits expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment. Includes expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication AND omits expected follow up care.

Does not address outcomes.

Lead Discussion

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

Fully, facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) open discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least two (2) discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least one (1) discussion questions for peers. Question posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic with two to three (2-3) questions BUT questions posed does not allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Does not lead discussion.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

 

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

 

Student responds to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

 

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue by Sunday, 11:59pm MT

Summary Requirement

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion.  Includes conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation with conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic but information presented is not clear or difficult to follow.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary to the original grand rounds presentation but omits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary BUT does not summarizes the initial discussion AND omits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic

Student does not post a summary by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Evidence Based Research/Articles

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

Include three (3) evidence based research or Peer Reviewed articles (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library.

Include two (2) evidence based research or Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library

Include one (1) evidence based research or Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library

Includes two or more articles for support but articles are not research or peer-reviewed from Chamberlain Online Library

 

OR

 

Two or more articles are older than 5 years

Does not include evidence based research or peer reviewed articles from Chamberlain Online Library

Evidence Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

Include a minimal of two (2) current (within last 5 years) EBP clinical guidelines.

Includes a minimal of two (2) EBP clinical guidelines but guidelines presented are older than 5 years.

Includes one (1) current (within last 5 years) EBP clinical guidelines.

Includes one (1) EBP clinical guidelines but guidelines presented is older than 5 years.

Does not present evidence based practice guidelines.

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

 

Student responds substantively with additional insight to all faculty directed questions.  This includes question(s) to the individual student and any questions posed to the class as a whole by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds substantively to at least one faculty directed questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to two or more faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to only one faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue with faculty by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Presentation Development

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

1 Points

0 Points

 

Overall presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura. Lab coat and name badge present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing one (1) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat, no name badge not present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing two (2) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing three (3) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Overall presentation is not clear OR missing four or more of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources,  recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Total Points

                                                             of 150 points

 

 

 

 

 

                                     PLEASE READ RUBRIC AND ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES CAREFULLY AND FOLLOW.

 

                                                             ORIGINAL, QUALITY WORK PLEASE

 

 

 

Available Answer
$ 29.00

[Solved] The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student's clinical reasonining, confidence, and..

  • This solution has been not purchased yet.
  • Submitted On 13 Aug, 2019 05:16:42
Answer posted by
solution
- Acne Vulgaris is a common disease that affects the skin - It invol...
Buy now to view full solution.
Other Similar Questions
User Profile
Jose

The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student's clinical reasonining, confidence, and..

- Acne Vulgaris is a common disease that affects the skin - It involves the inflammation of hair follicles and sebaceous glands - The risk factors of the condition include the follicular epidermal hyperproliferation... ...
User Profile
Tutor...

What is the purpose of National Greenhouse & Energy Reporting Legislation?

Activity 1. 1. What is the purpose of National Greenhouse & Energy Reporting Legislation? The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act (NGER Act 2007) establishes the legislative framework for the NGER Scheme which is a...
User Profile
Tutor...

The purpose of this assignment is for students to apply the framework of a job aid to document

Job Aid Steps of the job aid Steps explanation in problem solving 1 Share: it is the first step which employees should take they realize that a certain problem have emerged within the organization(Silberman, &Biech, 2015)....
User Profile
Tutor...

What are the purpose of change management ?q1b.What are the three

1. The purpose of the Change Management process is to control the lifecycle of all changes, enabling useful changes to be made with minimum disruption to IT services. The three change model is business process re-engineering,...
User Profile
Tutor...

A question about a creative organization

Mastering Leadership Introduction In this paper, we will discuss regarding the” Mastering leadership.” According to my understanding, I take the Macdonald as Mastering leadership organization.The best associations after s...

The benefits of buying study notes from CourseMerit

homeworkhelptime
Assurance Of Timely Delivery
We value your patience, and to ensure you always receive your homework help within the promised time, our dedicated team of tutors begins their work as soon as the request arrives.
tutoring
Best Price In The Market
All the services that are available on our page cost only a nominal amount of money. In fact, the prices are lower than the industry standards. You can always expect value for money from us.
tutorsupport
Uninterrupted 24/7 Support
Our customer support wing remains online 24x7 to provide you seamless assistance. Also, when you post a query or a request here, you can expect an immediate response from our side.
closebutton

$ 629.35