Logo
Question DetailsNormal
$ 20.00
Case Study 2: Forced Decryption Ruled Unconstitutional
Question posted by
request

Read the article titled, “U.S. Courts Rule For–and Against–P rotecting a Suspect's Hard Drives” located at the following IEEE Spectrum link: http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/computing/it/us-courts-rule-for-and-against-protecting-a-suspects-hard-drives 

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Analyze the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the government.
  2. Evaluate the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint and determine whether or not you would consider this an “open door” for criminal activity. Justify your answer.
  3. Take a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system. Suggest at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.
  4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. 
  • Outline system forensics issues, laws, and skills.
  • Compare and contrast the various types of computer forensic tools.
  • Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in computer forensics.
  • Write clearly and concisely about topics related to computer forensics planning using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

Read the article titled, “U.S. Courts Rule For–and Against–P rotecting a Suspect's Hard Drives” located at the following IEEE Spectrum link: http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/computing/it/us-courts-rule-for-and-against-protecting-a-suspects-hard-drives 

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Analyze the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the government.
  2. Evaluate the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint and determine whether or not you would consider this an “open door” for criminal activity. Justify your answer.
  3. Take a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system. Suggest at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.
  4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. 
  • Outline system forensics issues, laws, and skills.
  • Compare and contrast the various types of computer forensic tools.
  • Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in computer forensics.
  • Write clearly and concisely about topics related to computer forensics planning using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

 

Available Solution
$ 20.00
Case Study 2: Forced Decryption Ruled Unconstitutional
  • This Solution has been Purchased 1 time
  • Submitted On 16 Nov, 2017 02:11:16
Solution posted by
solution
Read the article titled, “U.S. Courts Rule For–and Against–P rotecting a Suspect's Hard Drives” located at the following IEEE Spectrum link: http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/computing/it/us-courts-rule-for-and-against-protecting-a-suspects-hard-drives Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: Analyze the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit ...
Buy now to view full solution.
closebutton

$ 629.35